What We Found with OmniKül
- Aug 24
- 1 min read
Summary of OmniKül Cooling Efficacy Testing
A recent comparative report, documented in the "OmniKul_Cooling_Evidence_Brief_v10.pdf", outlines the performance differences between OmniKül and traditional ice treatments. Across a series of equine and bench tests, the data indicate
s that OmniKül achieved lower temperatures, faster threshold crossing, and longer cooling persistence.
Equine Testing Results
The live-animal testing utilized horses as an early mammalian model under veterinary supervision.
Maximum Temperature Drop: OmniKül recorded a maximum baseline-adjusted temperature drop of -8.6°F. The ice treatment recorded a maximum drop of -4.0°F.
Cooling Persistence: At 30 minutes post-treatment, the region treated with OmniKül remained 2.0 to 2.2°F below the baseline temperature. In contrast, the ice-treated region measured 2.8°F above baseline at the same 30-minute mark.
Thermal Proxy: In a focused subset of thermal-matrix records, the body/limb region of interest proxy for OmniKül measured 64.8°F, which was 10.3°F lower than the 75.1°F recorded for ice.
Bench Testing Results
Bench tests were conducted using mass-matched ham samples to measure both cooling speed at the surface and cooling penetration.
Cooling Rate: OmniKül reached the 60°F surface threshold in 87 minutes. This was 54% faster than the 190 minutes required by the ice treatment.
Deep Penetration: Measurements taken from a probe embedded four inches deep at the four-hour mark showed OmniKül at 45.6°F. The ice sample measured 60.7°F at the same depth and time interval.
Surface Endpoint: At the four-hour mark, the surface temperature for OmniKül was 40.4°F, which was 19.1°F lower than the 59.5°F recorded for ice.
The consolidated data from these primary comparative tests demonstrates measurable differences in thermal reduction and duration between the two cooling media.
Comments